Google Ads For Roofers
SkilledDesk runs Google Ads for roofers with two separate budgets under one account — one ad group and cost-per-lead target for insurance-claim, storm-driven leads, another for retail, out-of-pocket repair leads — tracked through to a booked job instead of a blended average
that hides which lead type is actually paying off.
What One Blended Lead Number Hides
A Blended Cost-Per-Lead Number Hides Which Leads Are Actually Working
One average cost-per-lead across an entire roofing account tells you almost nothing on its own. A rising number can mean the account is pulling in more storm-driven, insurance-claim leads, which cost more per click but close at a far higher rate than a retail repair call. A falling number can just as easily mean the $10,000-plus claim leads quietly stopped showing up at all, while cheaper retail calls kept the average looking fine.
The Ad Copy A Storm-Claim Searcher Needs Isn't What A Cash Buyer Needs
A homeowner mid-insurance-claim wants to know a contractor documents damage the way an adjuster expects and has handled a claim before. A homeowner paying out of pocket wants a fast, plain number. One ad group, one landing page and one script trying to answer both leaves each buyer half-answered.
Local Services Ads Can't Tell The Two Lead Types Apart On Its Own
LSA bills per lead the moment a call connects, with no field for whether that call turns into a $14,000 insurance-approved replacement or an $850 patch job. Without a tracking layer built on top of it, the platform's own reporting treats both as the same line item.
A Roofing Ads Account Is Really Two Accounts Sharing One Login
Call it one Google Ads account. It runs two completely different sales processes off the same phone number.
One side is storm-driven. A homeowner with hail or wind damage is usually already talking to an insurance adjuster, the roof gets replaced at $10,000-$20,000 or more, and the search terms lean toward "storm damage roof claim" and "insurance roof inspection." The other side is retail. A homeowner with a slow leak or a handful of missing shingles is paying out of pocket, the job runs $800-$5,000, and the decision gets made in a single phone call, not a multi-week adjuster process. SkilledDesk is a Wyoming-registered company running Google Ads and Local Services Ads campaigns built around that split. The same account-structure thinking sits inside our broader roofing marketing work; this page is about the paid-search side of it specifically.
Treat both lead types as one account and the reporting stops meaning anything. A cost-per-lead that looks too high might just mean more claim-type traffic is coming in, which costs more per click and closes at a far higher rate once the adjuster signs off. A cost-per-lead that looks great might mean the campaign quietly stopped finding claim leads at all, the ones actually worth chasing. Splitting ad groups, negative-keyword lists and the landing page each lead type sees is what keeps that number honest.
Check These Numbers Before You Sign Anything
Turn Your Target Lead Mix Into A Monthly Budget
Set how many insurance-claim leads and how many retail-repair leads you want each month. See a realistic combined monthly ad budget and how it should split between the two, based on current cost-per-lead benchmarks for each lead type.
Based on illustrative cost-per-lead assumptions of roughly $210 for claim-type leads and $90 for retail-type leads, drawn from current roofing Google Ads benchmarks. Actual cost per lead varies by market, season, and competition.
Google Ads Built Around Two Different Roofing Buyers
Search accounts split by lead type
Separate ad groups, keywords and bids for insurance-claim searches and retail-repair searches, so one blended campaign never has to serve both buyers at once.
Learn moreLanding pages that match the lead
A claim-type visitor lands on a page built around documentation and the adjuster process. A retail visitor lands on a page built around a fast, plain price.
Learn morePaid social for the retail side of the business
Meta campaigns aimed at the smaller, faster-closing retail repairs search alone rarely catches early, run on a budget separate from claim-side spend.
Learn moreIs It Worth Paying More Per Click For Claim Leads When Retail Leads Are Cheaper?
A claim-side lead can look far more expensive than a retail lead by cost-per-lead alone. Industry data puts blended roofing cost-per-lead at a median near $124, but claim-heavy storm season pushes it past $300, and the most competitive markets past $600, while retail keywords hold much steadier. Priced that way, the claim side of a roofing account always looks like the worse deal. Priced on cost-per-booked-job instead, industry figures put insurance-restoration work at roughly $100-$400 per signed contract against $200-$600 for retail residential work, because a 50-70% close rate on claim leads, against 20-35% on retail, offsets the higher price per lead.
That is the whole argument for keeping the two separate instead of averaging them into one number. A properly split account reports claim-side and retail-side cost-per-lead as two separate lines on the monthly statement, never folded into one blended average — the founder sets both targets with you before the campaign launches. If a report only ever shows one cost-per-lead figure for the whole account, the split described on this page isn't actually running in it.
What This Page Can Actually Point To
What Roofing Owners Ask About Google Ads
Your Next Campaign Should Report Two Numbers, Not One
Tell us your rough claim-to-retail mix and we'll show you what a properly split account should look like.
Get Free Consultation