Schedule
DSGVO Architecture, DATEV-Ready Output

Full-Stack Web Development Agency Germany

React/Next.js and Node.js applications for German businesses that have outgrown WordPress or Shopify, with a BDSG/DSGVO-aligned data model, a compliant Impressum, and DATEV-ready invoicing built in from the first architecture conversation.

Get Free ConsultationView All Services
skilleddesk.com/analytics
Quote Requests
15,377
+58% QoQ
Revenue trend, last 8 weeks
Web designFull-stack web developmentSocial media marketingGoogle PPC campaignDropshipping websiteEmail marketing & automationConversion tracking setupGraphic designWeb designFull-stack web developmentSocial media marketingGoogle PPC campaignDropshipping websiteEmail marketing & automationConversion tracking setupGraphic design

One Standard, Applied In Germany

130+
Brands Served
14+
Countries Reached
2019
Founded, Serving Clients Worldwide
1:1
Direct Founder Access
The Problem

The Points A Template Fails In Germany

A Contact Page With No Impressum That Actually Holds Up

German law requires a proper Impressum on every business website — a legal notice naming the company's Handelsregister entry, its USt-IdNr, and a responsible contact person, not just a generic "Contact Us" form. A missing or incomplete Impressum is a genuine basis for a formal warning letter (Abmahnung) from a competitor or a consumer-protection association, and a template built for a different market has no structured place to hold those specific fields at all.

An Internal Tool Rolled Out Before The Betriebsrat Ever Saw It

Under §87 of the Betriebsverfassungsgesetz, a company with a works council generally needs that council's sign-off before introducing any software capable of monitoring employee performance or behaviour — a login-timestamp log or an activity dashboard can trigger that requirement without anyone intending it to. An off-the-shelf HR or internal-portal tool has no way to flag that it needs a co-determination review before launch, only after someone challenges it.

A Billing Tool Your Steuerberater Has To Fight With Every Month

Most German tax advisors work directly against a DATEV-format export, and a billing tool that only produces a PDF or a generic CSV just moves the manual work from one desk to another — someone re-keys every transaction by hand at month-end regardless. The same tool also has to split line items correctly between the 19% standard Umsatzsteuer rate and the 7% reduced rate where it applies, not treat tax handling as a single flat setting.

What We Build

What A German Engagement Delivers

Builds that take data rules seriously

React and Node work where consent and data handling are designed in, because German users and regulators both check.

Learn more

Paid social with strict consent

Meta campaigns built for a market with high privacy expectations, where tracking has to be consent-gated properly.

Learn more

Search work for a large B2B market

Google campaigns for Europe's biggest economy, where long procurement cycles change what a click is worth. Handover includes the repository and a written runbook, so another team could take the project on without a discovery phase.

Learn more

What Full-Stack Means On A German Project

A German business outgrows WordPress or Shopify in three places, and all three involve somebody official. SkilledDesk works as a full-stack web development agency for Germany, designing consent handling in rather than bolting it on before launch. A contact page with no Impressum that would hold up to a warning letter. An internal tool rolled out to staff before the Betriebsrat ever reviewed it. And a billing system that hands the Steuerberater a PDF instead of a DATEV-ready export. Three plugins means three partial copies of the same data. None is the source of truth. Reconciling them by hand afterward is the real risk.

What gives all three a single source of truth is one custom application built on React and Node holds every requirement in one database from day one, so exactly one place ever needs checking. SkilledDesk already runs this same setup for clients in 13 other countries. As a full-stack web development company working with the German market, we design that database against the BDSG and DSGVO from the first architecture conversation. That means a compliant Impressum wired into the site itself, employee-facing features flagged early enough for a Betriebsrat review before rollout, and invoicing that exports in the format a Steuerberater already expects. Three problems, one schema. Support runs on a same-business-day response commitment tied to German office hours, rather than a hoped-for live overlap.

FAQ

German Buyers Raise These Questions

German compliance layers on top of the EU baseline rather than replacing it. The Bundesdatenschutzgesetz adds requirements the GDPR alone does not cover. Section 26 sets stricter rules on how a company may collect and use employee data. A generic DSGVO consent-banner integration does not clear that bar on its own. German law also requires a proper Impressum. That is a legal notice naming the business's Handelsregister entry, its USt-IdNr and a responsible contact. Missing details on that page are a real basis for a formal warning letter. A competitor or a consumer-protection association can send one. Both go into the application from the first architecture conversation, not after a warning letter has already arrived.
A German business asking for a Kostenvoranschlag expects a firm, itemised figure. Not a vague starting-from range. So that is what comes back after the discovery call, not before it. What decides the number is how many user roles, integrations and dashboards the build has to carry. A single-feature booking tool sizes up quickly. A multi-role platform with billing and permission tiers takes a longer scoping conversation. Either way the quote returns in EUR with the standard 19% Umsatzsteuer already included, not added as a surprise line afterward. The itemisation matters as much as the total. A single number tells you nothing about which part of the build you could drop, defer, or hand to someone in-house later, and that is usually the first question a careful buyer wants answered before signing anything. Ours opens at $1,199, quoted in euro, and a Kostenvoranschlag from us itemises the hours rather than handing over a single closing number.
It has to, or it just moves the manual work from one desk to another. Most German tax advisors work against DATEV-format exports. An invoicing tool that only produces a PDF or a generic CSV means someone re-keys each transaction by hand at month end anyway. That export goes into the billing architecture from the start. So does splitting line items between the 19% standard Umsatzsteuer rate and the 7% reduced rate. The reduced rate is the part most builds get wrong, because it applies to a defined list rather than a category anyone can guess at. A single flat setting for the whole invoice will look right for months and then produce one filing nobody can defend. We settle which rate applies to which line on the discovery call, with the client's own Steuerberater in the loop if they want to be.
Yes, and it is worth planning for before the first line of code, not after somebody challenges a rollout. Under section 87 of the Betriebsverfassungsgesetz, a company with a works council generally needs its sign-off before introducing any software capable of monitoring employee performance or behaviour. A login-timestamp log, an activity dashboard, even certain reporting features can trigger that requirement. We map that co-determination step in from the discovery call. The rollout date then accounts for it, instead of stalling on a sign-off nobody budgeted time for.
What moves this number for a German build is not the feature list on its own. It is how many separate sign-offs the project has to clear before it can go live. A tool with no employee-facing features and no Steuerberater-facing export ships fastest. Add a Betriebsrat co-determination review or a DATEV-format billing requirement, and each one is a genuine approval loop to schedule around. We draw that approval map on the discovery call before committing to a delivery date. Skip that step and a build finished in March can still sit unlaunched in June.
Support here does not run on a fixed number of overlapping hours. It runs on a same-business-day response commitment tied to German office hours, whatever a given week's overlap with the US East Coast happens to be. A ticket filed during the German working day gets a first response before that day ends. Live call or async follow-through, either way. Anything raised outside German hours reaches a desk first thing the next business day. That commitment sits in the engagement itself, the same standard already running for clients in 13 other countries. It matters most in the weeks around the clock changes, when Germany and the US shift on different weekends and a fixed overlap window quietly moves by an hour without anyone announcing it.
A lot of local quotes start as a rough estimate and grow through a string of Nachträge. Those are separately billed change orders, which arrive once the real scope shows up mid-build. Each SkilledDesk engagement gets one written scope document alongside the itemised EUR quote before anything starts. A change in requirements then shows up as a visible, agreed addition rather than a surprise line on the next invoice. The founder runs the project directly from architecture through handoff, and real client applications sit open on the portfolio to check first. That is the whole mechanism. Nothing about it depends on trusting an estimate that was never written down properly in the first place.

When No-Code Runs Out In Germany

A page builder or a WordPress theme handles a straightforward brochure site in Germany just as well as anywhere else. That was never the problem. The problem starts the moment one of those tools has to hold logic nobody built it for. That might be an Impressum with the exact Handelsregister and USt-IdNr fields German law requires, a co-determination check before an internal tool reaches staff under a works council, or a billing export a Steuerberater can load without re-keying it by hand. Any one of those breaks a theme. Covering each gap with a separate plugin means paying that plugin's own subscription for as long as the site exists. None of that spend ever becomes something the business owns. A custom build changes the other side of that. At handoff the client holds the code outright. One written scope document and an itemised EUR quote with 19% Umsatzsteuer included cover the price. The founder carries the project from the first architecture sketch through to launch. And the next feature request simply extends that same foundation instead of stacking another plugin onto it.

Look At The Builds Before The Figure

The founder who scopes a German engagement signs off on every build behind it. Those projects sit on the portfolio, open to check before you book anything in.
See Our Full Portfolio

Ready To Replace Three Plugins With One Application?

Send the spec and we'll return an estimate with the consent architecture already accounted for.

Get Free Consultation